Non-physical / Social Object¶

Local identifier: xwkont:concept:non-physical-social-object Slug: non-physical-social-object Editorial status: reviewed Created: 2026-07-07 Modified: 2026-07-07

Scope Note¶

This crosswalk compares how the checked source ontologies model non-physical bearer-level entities that are not physical objects or amounts of matter: DOLCE's base-module non-physical-endurant / non-physical-object branch, plus the closest non-physical or object-adjacent analogs found in the other seven source ontologies.

DOLCE-Lite.owl is the only source that directly reifies the in-scope axis as a formal class in its core module. Its base file defines non-physical-endurant and non-physical-object directly, but not the classic DOLCE-family Mental-Object / Social-Object leaf split. That social-object apparatus lives in other DOLCE-family artifacts already crosswalked elsewhere, so this crosswalk cites those crosswalks by ID where relevant instead of re-deriving them. UFO is a second, independently-confirmed source (found during review, not in the original draft): its 2021 paper uses the identical phrase "non-physical endurants," with a worked example, in a footnote on the constitution relation — not a reified class or formal definition, but a direct terminological and conceptual match, not incidental word use.

Core.ttl placement was resolved 2026-07-07 (session-050): xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject, a single umbrella class under Continuant, not split into a separate Social Object branch.

Labels, Alternate Labels, and Source Terminology¶

Role	Label or term	Source	Language	Notes
XwkOnt working label	Non-physical / Social Object	XwkOnt	`en`	Working label for the non-physical bearer-level object axis.
Source term	non-physical-endurant	DOLCE	`en`	Core DOLCE branch root for the in-scope axis.
Source term	non-physical-object	DOLCE	`en`	Core DOLCE base-module child on that axis.
Source term	generically dependent continuant	BFO	`en`	Closest BFO-dependent non-physical branch.
Source term	immaterial entity	BFO	`en`	Additional BFO non-material hit, but not the same branch as GDC.
Source term	Abstract	SUMO	`en`	SUMO's broad non-physical bucket.
Source term	Proposition	SUMO	`en`	SUMO's abstract content-like subclass.
Source term	non-physical endurants	UFO	`en`	Informal footnote usage (not a reified class), identical phrase to DOLCE's own branch root, with a worked example. Found during independent review, missed by the original draft. Closest additional formal terms in the paper are Object, Relator, Mode, Quality.
Source term	(no dedicated non-physical/social-object class found; closest formal terms are Material_object, Material_persistant, Mental_stratum, Social_stratum, Social_role, Relator)	GFO	`en`	GFO splits material objects from mental/social strata and roles, but not a non-physical/social-object class.
Source term	informational object / representation	YAMATO	`en`	Section-level conceptual apparatus, not a reified source class in the fetchable report.
Source term	object	TUpper	`en`	TUpper's broad object class.
Source term	SimpleThing	GUM	`en`	GUM's broad object-like top-level class.

Source Definitions and Contextual Notes¶

Source	Term or identifier	Dimension	Claim type	Definition, quotation, or paraphrase	Reference	Locator	Notes
DOLCE	non-physical-endurant	technical	direct quotation	"An endurant with no mass, generically constantly depending on some agent. Non-physical endurants can have physical constituents (e.g. in the case of members of a collection)." The base file makes this the root of the non-physical endurant branch, with `rdfs:subClassOf endurant`, `part only non-physical-endurant`, and `has-quality only abstract-quality`.	`xwkont:ref:dolce-lite-owl`	`DOLCE-Lite.owl`, `owl:Class#non-physical-endurant`, fetched and read directly 2026-07-07	Corrected during independent review (2026-07-07): the draft's original quotation truncated this `rdfs:comment` to "An endurant with no mass," dropping the constant-dependence-on-an-agent clause and the physical-constituents caveat — both restored here from the primary source. `owl:disjointWith` is asserted on sibling classes rather than locally on this class: `physical-endurant` is disjoint with `non-physical-endurant`, and `arbitrary-sum` is also disjoint with it.
DOLCE	non-physical-object	both	direct quotation	"Formerly known as description." The class is a unitary endurant with no mass, generically dependent on an agent and a communication act, and the file says that both descriptions and concepts are non-physical objects. `rdfs:subClassOf non-physical-endurant`; `part only non-physical-object`; `generically-dependent-on some physical-endurant`.	`xwkont:ref:dolce-lite-owl`	`DOLCE-Lite.owl`, `owl:Class#non-physical-object`, fetched and read directly 2026-07-07	No further subclasses beneath `non-physical-object` were found in the base module.
BFO	generically dependent continuant	technical	paraphrase	An entity that exists because there is at least one copy whose content or pattern can be shared with other copies. This is the closest BFO non-physical dependent branch on the core-file side.	`xwkont:ref:bfo-2020`	`bfo-core.ttl`, class `generically dependent continuant`, fetched and read directly 2026-07-07	`immaterial entity` is also present in the same file, but it is a different class and not a social-object branch.
BFO	immaterial entity	technical	paraphrase	An independent continuant with no material entity as continuant part. This is a non-material hit, but it is not the same modeling choice as DOLCE's non-physical bearer branch.	`xwkont:ref:bfo-2020`	`bfo-core.ttl`, class `immaterial entity`, fetched and read directly 2026-07-07	Relevant as a lexical hit only, not as a social-object analog.
SUMO	Abstract	technical	paraphrase	SUMO puts `List`, `Proposition`, `Attribute`, `Relation`, and related content-like classes on the abstract side of its `Entity` partition. That is the broad non-physical bucket closest to this candidate.	`xwkont:ref:sumo-niles-pease-2001`	`Merge.kif`, `Abstract`, fetched and read directly 2026-07-07	Broad abstract branch, not a social-object hierarchy.
SUMO	Proposition	technical	direct quotation	"Propositions are Abstract entities that express a complete thought or a set of such thoughts... A Proposition is an abstraction that may have multiple representations: strings, sounds, icons, etc." This is the most content-like SUMO hit in the checked material, but it is still propositional content rather than a bearer-level social object.	`xwkont:ref:sumo-niles-pease-2001`	`Merge.kif`, `Proposition`, fetched and read directly 2026-07-07	Corrected during independent review (2026-07-07): the draft's original text ("An abstract entity that may have multiple representations") was a paraphrase mislabeled as a direct quotation — restored to `Merge.kif`'s actual documentation string, including the primary "complete thought" definition the paraphrase dropped. Useful as a nearby non-physical analog, not as an exact object branch.
UFO	non-physical endurants	technical	direct quotation	"We do admit, however, relations of constitution between non-physical endurants. For example, a software program is constituted by software code, not identical to it."	`xwkont:ref:ufo-2021`	complete extracted paper text reused from the 2026-07-06 extraction (footnote 8, in the constitution-relation discussion); live fetch attempts in this session were blocked by HTTP 403	Found during independent review (2026-07-07), missed entirely by the Codex draft, which claimed "the searched text does not introduce a dedicated non-physical/social-object class" without having actually located this passage. UFO does not reify "non-physical endurant" as its own formal class or give it a dedicated definition the way DOLCE does — it appears only in this one footnote, in service of an argument about the constitution relation's asymmetry — but it is a direct, literal use of the identical phrase DOLCE uses for its own branch root, with a worked example (a software program constituted by, but not identical to, its software code) that is itself a plausible non-physical-object instance. This is the strongest textual hit of any of the 7 non-DOLCE sources checked.
UFO	Object / Relator / Mode / Quality	both	editorial observation	The paper builds a four-category ontology with object types, moments, and abstract particulars. Beyond the "non-physical endurants" footnote above, the searched text does not introduce a further dedicated non-physical/social-object class; the closest additional formal terms are `Object`, `Relator`, `Mode`, and `Quality`, plus the theoretical phrase `abstract particulars`.	`xwkont:ref:ufo-2021`	complete extracted paper text reused from the 2026-07-06 extraction; live fetch attempts in this session were blocked by HTTP 403	Formal class-level hit, but not on the requested object/social-object axis.
GFO	Material_object / Material_persistant / Social_stratum / Social_role	both	paraphrase	`gfo-base.owl` reifies a material-object branch and a separate mental/social stratum apparatus, but no dedicated non-physical/social-object class. `Material_persistant` says these are the entities sometimes called continuants or objects; social and mental content is handled via `Social_stratum`, `Mental_stratum`, `Social_role`, and `Relator`.	`xwkont:ref:gfo`	`modules/gfo-base.owl`, fetched and read directly 2026-07-07	Reified classes are present, but not the requested bearer-level non-physical/social-object branch.
YAMATO	informational object / representation	both	paraphrase	The report has a dedicated section on informational objects and another on representation. It treats them as content-bearing things and distinguishes representation from representing thing, but the fetchable report does not reify a dedicated social-object class.	`xwkont:ref:yamato-mizoguchi-2010`	independently re-verified 2026-07-07 (session-051): `YAMATO101216.pdf` re-fetched fresh via the Wayback Machine snapshot and re-extracted with `pdftotext`, grepped for "social object," "non-physical," and "nonphysical" -- zero hits for all three. The informational-object/representation apparatus was independently confirmed present (section-level discussion of informational objects, representation vs. representing thing). Prior review flagged this row as inherited from the Codex draft, not independently re-checked; now confirmed.	Section-level conceptual apparatus only, confirmed absent of a social-object class by independent full-text search, not merely inherited from the draft.
TUpper	object	technical	direct quotation	"An object is anything that is not a timepoint, nor an activity nor an activity-occurrence." The prose also says objects can be concrete or abstract things that participate in an activity.	`xwkont:ref:tupper-colore`	`TUpper-Terms.html`, fetched and read directly 2026-07-07	Broad object class, not a social-object branch.
GUM	SimpleThing	technical	direct quotation	"An entity which may participate in a configuration." GUM's object-like top level is a linguistic `SimpleThing` / `Process` split, not a non-physical/social-object hierarchy.	`xwkont:ref:gum-owl`	`GUM-31.owl.txt`, class `SimpleThing`, fetched and read directly 2026-07-07	Broad object-like class, but linguistically motivated.

Source Ontology Correspondences¶

Correspondence ID	Source ontology	Source term	Source identifier or IRI	Source version	Reference	Inclusion rationale
`xwkont:correspondence:non-physical-social-object:001`	DOLCE	non-physical-endurant / non-physical-object	`http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#non-physical-endurant` / `http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite.owl#non-physical-object`	397	`xwkont:ref:dolce-lite-owl`	This is the only source that directly reifies the in-scope axis in its base module. `non-physical-endurant` is the branch root, and `non-physical-object` is the only base-module child found there.
`xwkont:correspondence:non-physical-social-object:002`	BFO	generically dependent continuant / immaterial entity	`BFO_0000031` / `BFO_0000141`	BFO 2020	`xwkont:ref:bfo-2020`	BFO's closest non-physical territory, but it is broader and not object/social-object specific. Corrected during independent review (2026-07-07) — the draft's original IRI for "immaterial entity" (`BFO_0000142`) is actually `bfo-core.ttl`'s "fiat line" class; "immaterial entity" is `BFO_0000141`.
`xwkont:correspondence:non-physical-social-object:003`	SUMO	Abstract / Proposition	`Abstract` / `Proposition`	FOIS 2001 / current `Merge.kif`	`xwkont:ref:sumo-niles-pease-2001`	SUMO routes non-physical content into an abstract branch, with Proposition as its most content-like subclass.
`xwkont:correspondence:non-physical-social-object:004`	UFO	non-physical endurants	not applicable — informal footnote usage, not a reified class or IRI	UFO 2021 paper	`xwkont:ref:ufo-2021`	Corrected during independent review (2026-07-07): the draft's original row recorded "not applicable" here, having missed a direct hit. UFO's own paper uses the identical phrase "non-physical endurants," with a worked example, in a footnote on the constitution relation — not a reified class, but a real terminological and conceptual match, the strongest of any non-DOLCE source checked. The paper's broader object/moment/abstract-particular apparatus remains relevant background but is not itself the primary hit.
`xwkont:correspondence:non-physical-social-object:005`	GFO	(no dedicated non-physical/social-object class found)	not applicable	GFO 2024-11-18 release	`xwkont:ref:gfo`	GFO separates material objects from social/mental strata and roles, but not into a non-physical/social-object class.
`xwkont:correspondence:non-physical-social-object:006`	YAMATO	informational object / representation	not applicable	2010-12-16 report (independently re-fetched and re-extracted, 2026-07-07)	`xwkont:ref:yamato-mizoguchi-2010`	Confirmed absence -- YAMATO discusses the territory conceptually (informational object, representation vs. representing thing), but the fetchable report does not reify a dedicated social-object class; independent full-text search for "social object"/"non-physical"/"nonphysical" found zero hits.
`xwkont:correspondence:non-physical-social-object:007`	TUpper	object	`object`	TUpper COLORE formalization	`xwkont:ref:tupper-colore`	A broad object class that includes abstract things, but not a dedicated social-object branch.
`xwkont:correspondence:non-physical-social-object:008`	GUM	SimpleThing	`http://www.ontospace.uni-bremen.de/ontology/stable/GUM-3.owl#SimpleThing`	GUM 3.1	`xwkont:ref:gum-owl`	GUM's broad object-like top-level class is the nearest formal hit, but it is linguistically motivated and not a non-physical/social-object branch.

Semantic Comparison Notes¶

Note ID	Dimension	Claim type	Note	Supporting references	Confidence
`note-001`	technical	editorial observation	DOLCE-Lite.owl is the only checked base module that directly reifies the non-physical endurant/object axis in the requested sense. The file's internal structure is shallow: `non-physical-endurant` is the branch root, and `non-physical-object` is its only base-module child.	`xwkont:ref:dolce-lite-owl`	high
`note-002`	technical	editorial observation	The classic DOLCE social-object leaf split is not in `DOLCE-Lite.owl` itself. That matters because this draft is deliberately anchored to the base module only; the extension material that introduces `Mental-Object` / `Social-Object` is already crosswalked elsewhere and should stay cited there.	`xwkont:ref:dolce-lite-owl`, docs/crosswalks/concepts/situation-state-of-affairs.md, docs/crosswalks/concepts/role.md, docs/crosswalks/concepts/information-artifact.md	high
`note-003`	technical	editorial observation	BFO, SUMO, TUpper, and GUM all have broad object or content branches that can host non-physical entities, but none of them reifies a DOLCE-style non-physical/social-object hierarchy. Their best hits are broader than the candidate, not exact peers.	`xwkont:ref:bfo-2020`, `xwkont:ref:sumo-niles-pease-2001`, `xwkont:ref:tupper-colore`, `xwkont:ref:gum-owl`	medium-high
`note-004`	both	editorial observation	Corrected during independent review (2026-07-07): UFO's own paper explicitly uses the phrase "non-physical endurants" (footnote 8, constitution-relation discussion), with a worked example (a software program constituted by, but not identical to, its software code) — this is a genuine second source for the candidate, not merely nearby background, even though UFO does not reify the phrase as its own formal class or definition the way DOLCE does. The paper's broader four-category apparatus (objects, moments, abstract particulars) remains relevant structural context but is secondary to this direct textual hit.	`xwkont:ref:ufo-2021`	medium
`note-005`	technical	editorial observation	GFO splits the territory differently: material objects on one side, and mental/social strata plus roles on the other. That gives it social vocabulary, but not a social-object branch.	`xwkont:ref:gfo`	medium-high
`note-006`	technical	editorial observation	YAMATO's treatment of informational objects is explicitly about representation and content-bearing things, not a bearer-level social-object class. The report is useful as a conceptual analog, but it is prose-level rather than reified in the fetched artifact.	`xwkont:ref:yamato-mizoguchi-2010`	medium

Mapping Assertions or Candidate Relations¶

Per ADR-0009, each mapping records a predicate_id (SSSOM/SKOS predicate, or none for XwkOnt-only categories) and a mapping_justification (SEMAPV term, e.g. semapv:ManualMappingCuration) in addition to the free-text rationale.

Mapping ID	Subject	Relation category	Object	`predicate_id`	`mapping_justification`	Status	Confidence	Rationale	Provenance
`xwkont:mapping:non-physical-social-object:001`	DOLCE:non-physical-endurant	`broader-than`	xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject (candidate)	`skos:broadMatch`	`semapv:ManualMappingCuration`	candidate	high	The source term names the whole non-physical endurant branch, which is broader than the candidate's object/social-object reading.	`xwkont:ref:dolce-lite-owl`
`xwkont:mapping:non-physical-social-object:002`	DOLCE:non-physical-object	`close-match`	xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject (candidate)	`skos:closeMatch`	`semapv:ManualMappingCuration`	candidate	medium	This is the closest DOLCE base-module anchor, but it is still description/concept-centered and lacks the classic social-object leaf split inside the base file.	`xwkont:ref:dolce-lite-owl`
`xwkont:mapping:non-physical-social-object:003`	BFO:generically dependent continuant	`broader-than`	xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject (candidate)	`skos:broadMatch`	`semapv:ManualMappingCuration`	candidate	low-medium	BFO's branch is broader and departs from object/social-object modeling, but it is still the closest non-physical dependent-continuant hit in the core file.	`xwkont:ref:bfo-2020`
`xwkont:mapping:non-physical-social-object:004`	SUMO:Abstract / Proposition	`broader-than`	xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject (candidate)	`skos:broadMatch`	`semapv:ManualMappingCuration`	candidate	low	SUMO routes non-physical content into an abstract branch; that branch is broader than the candidate and not object/social-object specific.	`xwkont:ref:sumo-niles-pease-2001`
`xwkont:mapping:non-physical-social-object:005`	UFO:non-physical endurants	`related`	xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject (candidate)	`skos:relatedMatch`	`semapv:ManualMappingCuration`	candidate	medium	Corrected during independent review (2026-07-07), raised from `unknown`/low: UFO's paper uses the identical phrase "non-physical endurants" (footnote 8) with a worked example, a direct terminological and conceptual match — but not `close-match`, since UFO does not reify the phrase as its own class, definition, or formal branch the way DOLCE does; it appears only in service of an argument about the constitution relation.	`xwkont:ref:ufo-2021`
`xwkont:mapping:non-physical-social-object:006`	GFO:Material_object / Material_persistant / Social_stratum / Social_role	`unknown`	xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject (candidate)	none	`semapv:ManualMappingCuration`	candidate	low	GFO has social vocabulary and a material-object branch, but no dedicated non-physical/social-object class in the checked base module.	`xwkont:ref:gfo`
`xwkont:mapping:non-physical-social-object:007`	YAMATO:informational object / representation	`related`	xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject (candidate)	`skos:relatedMatch`	`semapv:ManualMappingCuration`	candidate	low	YAMATO's content-bearing representation theory is adjacent to the candidate, but the evidence is conceptual prose rather than a reified class.	`xwkont:ref:yamato-mizoguchi-2010`
`xwkont:mapping:non-physical-social-object:008`	TUpper:object	`broader-than`	xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject (candidate)	`skos:broadMatch`	`semapv:ManualMappingCuration`	candidate	low	TUpper's `object` is intentionally broad enough to include abstract things; that makes it broader than the candidate, not a social-object branch.	`xwkont:ref:tupper-colore`
`xwkont:mapping:non-physical-social-object:009`	GUM:SimpleThing	`broader-than`	xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject (candidate)	`skos:broadMatch`	`semapv:ManualMappingCuration`	candidate	low	GUM's object-like top-level class is broader than the candidate and shaped by linguistic realization, not by a social-object ontology.	`xwkont:ref:gum-owl`

Uncertainty, Non-Equivalence, and Open Questions¶

Item ID	Type	Description	Impact	Follow-up
`uncertainty-001`	~~open-question~~ Resolved 2026-07-07 (session-050): the maintainer confirmed umbrella-only placement — `xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject` as a single class under `Continuant`, not split into a separate Social Object branch, since DOLCE-Lite's own base module supports only the broader class. See `data/ontology/core.ttl` and `docs/ontology/core-ontology.md`.	Should XwkOnt eventually model this as one umbrella class or as a split between a non-physical-object branch and a separate social-object branch? DOLCE-Lite.owl itself only supports the first half in its base module.	Blocks final core.ttl placement.	Resolved -- no further action needed.
`uncertainty-002`	non-equivalence	The classic DOLCE `Mental-Object` / `Social-Object` / `Agentive-Social-Object` / `Non-Agentive-Social-Object` tree is not defined in `DOLCE-Lite.owl`. That tree belongs to other DOLCE-family artifacts already crosswalked elsewhere.	Prevents re-deriving the extension-module findings inside this draft.	Keep citing the existing crosswalk IDs when those artifacts are relevant.
`uncertainty-003`	uncertainty	BFO, SUMO, GFO, YAMATO, TUpper, and GUM each provide a nearest hit, but most are broader or structurally different rather than exact peers. UFO is the exception, found during review — it uses the identical phrase "non-physical endurants," but only informally (a footnote, not a reified class), so it is recorded at `related`/medium confidence rather than `close-match`.	Keeps the mapping categories conservative for 6 of the 7 non-DOLCE sources; UFO is the strongest secondary hit.	Revisit only if a later source or extension module reifies a more precise non-physical/social-object class, or if UFO's own OWL/gUFO artifacts (not consulted here) formalize this footnote usage.
`uncertainty-004`	~~open-question~~ Resolved 2026-07-07 (session-050): `xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject` (not `NonPhysicalSocialObject` -- renamed to match the actual placed class) now exists in `data/ontology/core.ttl`, under `Continuant`. Mapping rows' candidate placeholder renamed to match (session-051 cleanup).	`xwkont-core:NonPhysicalSocialObject` does not yet exist in `data/ontology/core.ttl`.	Core placement remains unresolved.	Resolved -- no further action needed.
`uncertainty-005`	~~uncertainty~~ Resolved 2026-07-07 (session-051): `YAMATO101216.pdf` re-fetched fresh via the Wayback Machine snapshot and re-extracted with `pdftotext`; full-text search for "social object," "non-physical," and "nonphysical" found zero hits, independently confirming the absence claim previously carried unverified from the Codex draft.	YAMATO's absence finding (informational object / representation, no dedicated social-object class) was not independently re-fetched during the session-048 review pass -- carried from the Codex draft.	This source's absence claim was unverified, not confirmed, unlike the directly re-fetched sources.	Resolved -- no further action needed.

Provenance and References¶

xwkont:ref:dolce-lite-owl — DOLCE-Lite OWL translation — verified directly against DOLCE-Lite.owl, 2026-07-07
xwkont:ref:bfo-2020 — Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) 2020 — verified directly against bfo-core.ttl, 2026-07-07
xwkont:ref:sumo-niles-pease-2001 — Towards a Standard Upper Ontology — verified directly against Merge.kif, 2026-07-07
xwkont:ref:ufo-2021 — UFO: Unified Foundational Ontology — verified directly against a complete paper-text extraction already present on disk; this session's live fetch attempts returned HTTP 403, 2026-07-07
xwkont:ref:gfo — General Formal Ontology (GFO) — verified directly against modules/gfo-base.owl, 2026-07-07
xwkont:ref:yamato-mizoguchi-2010 — YAMATO: Yet Another More Advanced Top-level Ontology — verified directly against YAMATO101216.txt, 2026-07-07
xwkont:ref:tupper-colore — TUpper COLORE formalization — verified directly against TUpper-Terms.html, 2026-07-07
xwkont:ref:gum-owl — GUM 3.1 OWL — verified directly against GUM-31.owl.txt, 2026-07-07

Review History¶

Review ID	Date	Outcome	Notes
—	2026-07-07	(unreviewed)	Draft created (Codex, GPT-5.4-Mini, Extra-High) after direct primary-source verification of DOLCE-Lite.owl and full-text searches of the other seven sources.
—	2026-07-07	reviewed	Independently re-verified against all 8 primary sources (session-048). Three defects found and corrected: (1) the DOLCE `non-physical-endurant` `rdfs:comment` quotation was truncated, dropping the constant-dependence-on-an-agent clause and the physical-constituents caveat; (2) the BFO correspondence table cited `BFO_0000142` for "immaterial entity" — that IRI is actually "fiat line" in `bfo-core.ttl`; the correct IRI is `BFO_0000141`; (3) SUMO's `Proposition` row was labeled `direct quotation` but contained a paraphrase, missing the primary "complete thought" definition. A genuine second source was also found, missed entirely by the original draft: UFO's 2021 paper uses the identical phrase "non-physical endurants" (footnote 8, constitution-relation discussion) with a worked example — not a reified class, but a direct terminological/conceptual hit, added as correspondence `004` and mapping `005` at `related`/medium confidence. GFO's absence finding (`Material_object`/`Material_persistant`/`Social_stratum`/`Social_role` present, no dedicated non-physical/social-object class) was independently re-confirmed directly against `modules/gfo-base.owl`. GUM's `SimpleThing` quotation and IRI were confirmed exact. TUpper's `object` quotation was confirmed exact (reusing the prior verified quote already on record in `xwkont:ref:tupper-colore`). YAMATO's paraphrase-level absence claim was not independently re-fetched this pass; treat as consistent with, but not independently re-confirmed against, prior crosswalks' own YAMATO findings. Advanced directly to `reviewed` per the reviewed-eligibility criterion: DOLCE-Lite.owl is DOLCE's own base module, an authoritative core source for `non-physical-endurant`/`non-physical-object`.
—	2026-07-07	Cross-reference update — YAMATO absence confirmed, no editorial_status change	Resolved `uncertainty-005`: `YAMATO101216.pdf` re-fetched fresh and full-text searched for "social object," "non-physical," and "nonphysical" — zero hits, independently confirming the absence claim. Also recorded `uncertainty-001`'s and `uncertainty-004`'s resolutions here for traceability (already decided in `core.ttl` by session-050: umbrella-only `xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject`); renamed this crosswalk's own mapping placeholders from `NonPhysicalSocialObject` to `NonPhysicalObject` to match. `editorial_status` remains `reviewed`.

Future Work¶

~~Confirm whether the XwkOnt core should keep this as a single umbrella concept or split off a separate social-object follow-up~~ — done 2026-07-07 (session-050): umbrella only, xwkont-core:NonPhysicalObject (uncertainty-001 resolved).
If the maintainer wants the classic DOLCE social-object leaves documented in this concept family, fetch and cite the extension artifact there rather than reusing the base-module file.
Revisit the broad-analog sources only if a later artifact reifies a closer non-physical/social-object branch.
~~YAMATO's absence finding (informational object / representation, no dedicated social-object class) was not independently re-fetched during the session-048 review pass~~ — done 2026-07-07 (session-051): re-fetched and confirmed absent (uncertainty-005 resolved).
UFO's gUFO/OWL artifacts (not consulted in this crosswalk, which used only the 2021 paper's extracted text) may formalize the "non-physical endurants" footnote as an actual class — worth checking if gUFO is ever added as its own independently-cited source.