Local identifier: xwkont:concept:<slug>
Slug: <slug>
Editorial status: draft
Created: YYYY-MM-DD
Modified: YYYY-MM-DD
Scope Note
State the scoped comparison question for this concept crosswalk. Identify source ontologies included and important exclusions.
Labels, Alternate Labels, and Source Terminology
| Role |
Label or term |
Source |
Language |
Notes |
| XwkOnt working label |
<label> |
XwkOnt |
en |
Required. |
| Source term |
<term> |
<source> |
en |
Repeat for each source term. |
| Alternate label |
<label> |
<source or XwkOnt> |
en |
Optional. |
Source Definitions and Contextual Notes
Per ADR-0010, each row records a Dimension: technical (formal/engineering representation), philosophical (metaphysical/theoretical commitments), or both. Attempt at least one philosophical row per source where the source's own documentation discusses its theoretical grounding; leave absent or unknown rather than inferring one.
| Source |
Term or identifier |
Dimension |
Claim type |
Definition, quotation, or paraphrase |
Reference |
Locator |
Notes |
<source> |
<term/id> |
technical/philosophical/both |
direct quotation/paraphrase |
<text> |
xwkont:ref:<slug> |
<section/page/IRI> |
<context> |
Source Ontology Correspondences
| Correspondence ID |
Source ontology |
Source term |
Source identifier or IRI |
Source version |
Reference |
Inclusion rationale |
xwkont:correspondence:<slug>:001 |
<ontology> |
<term> |
<id/IRI/unknown> |
<version/unknown> |
xwkont:ref:<slug> |
<why included> |
Semantic Comparison Notes
Per ADR-0010, each note also records a Dimension: technical, philosophical, or both.
| Note ID |
Dimension |
Claim type |
Note |
Supporting references |
Confidence |
note-001 |
technical/philosophical/both |
editorial observation/inference/paraphrase/direct quotation |
<comparison note> |
xwkont:ref:<slug> |
high/medium/low/unknown |
Mapping Assertions or Candidate Relations
Per ADR-0009, each mapping records a predicate_id (SSSOM/SKOS predicate, or none for XwkOnt-only categories) and a mapping_justification (SEMAPV term, e.g. semapv:ManualMappingCuration) in addition to the free-text rationale.
| Mapping ID |
Subject |
Relation category |
Object |
predicate_id |
mapping_justification |
Status |
Confidence |
Rationale |
Provenance |
xwkont:mapping:<slug>:001 |
<source term> |
<category> |
<source term> |
<skos:exactMatch or none> |
semapv:ManualMappingCuration |
candidate/reviewed/rejected |
high/medium/low/unknown |
<why> |
xwkont:ref:<slug> |
Uncertainty, Non-Equivalence, and Open Questions
| Item ID |
Type |
Description |
Impact |
Follow-up |
uncertainty-001 |
uncertainty/non-equivalence/incompatibility/open-question |
<description> |
<mapping or review impact> |
<next action> |
Provenance and References
List repository-local reference identifiers used by this crosswalk. Every quotation, paraphrase, editorial observation, inference, and mapping assertion should point to a reference record.
xwkont:ref:<slug> — <short label>
Review History
| Review ID |
Date |
Outcome |
Notes |
xwkont:review:<slug>:YYYY-MM-DD:01 |
YYYY-MM-DD |
<outcome> |
<notes> |
Future Work